skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration
  • Correlation between oil price moves and consumer spending power has weakened
  • Energy sector is an important contributor to investment element of GDP
  • Energy Intensity has fallen markedly and is set to decline further

By David Ader, Informa Financial Intelligence Chief Market Strategist

The price of oil has pretty much doubled from a year ago, raising questions about whether the increase will be a hit to consumers and add to inflation pressures. This isn't so far-fetched. At one time, lower oil prices -- we really mean gas prices -- conformed to an uptick in consumer spending in the form of at-the-pump tax relief. The inverse held true; higher gas prices were an effective tax.

Alas, this perspective and the potential correlation has weakened, which is to say that lower or higher oil/gas prices have less impact on gross domestic product and, to a degree, on inflation. In short, there are some good reasons to be concerned about higher energy prices. A "tax" on the consumer shouldn't rank too high as a risk.

In a curious twist of fate, as the U.S. becomes more of a fuel producer, lower energy prices could have an adverse economic impact. The windfall to the consumer is gone and has been replaced by stress on the energy sector. Granted, the latter is not a big employer, but in terms of growth it was perhaps the single largest contributor to business investment in the GDP equation until the oil bust of 2014.

The main question here involves our use of energy. There is a concept called “Energy Intensity," which measures the amount of energy in British Thermal Units for each dollar of GDP. The measure, produced by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, has been in steep decline since the 1970s and, according to the EIA, will decline further in coming years. Here are some numbers: In 1974, we consumed about 10,000 BTUs for every dollar of GDP. That's in constant prices (adjusted for inflation). That figure was more or less steady from the 1950s to the 1970s. But things changed in the late 70s and that figure has been dropping ever since.


Energy Intensity


The latest data, from the end of 2014, showed that number had fallen to 3,880 BTUs. A few years ago, EIA projected usage would drop by almost half by 2040.  This wasn't just happening in the U.S. either. In July, the EIA noted that energy intensity had dropped 32 percent as a world average from 1990-2015, 32 percent in OECD countries and 40 percent in non-OECD countries.


US avg MPG


There are many reasons for this decline. First, the economies of the U.S. and Western Europe are far less based on manufacturing, which used energy rather more than economies based on services. Another reason is that we are more fuel efficient. Take cars. In 1990, the average car used 28 miles per gallon and light trucks burned 20.8 mpg. By 2015, those figures were 36.4 and 26.3, respectively, according to Bureau of Transportation statistics. There has been a particularly sharp ramping up in fuel efficiency in the last ten years. Recognizing the possibility of looser regulations under a Trump administration, the EPA did reaffirmed in December that the goal is for a 54.5 mpg target by 2025.


EIA All Motor vehicles


Also, we seem to be driving less. The EIA indicated that as of 2014, the average annual mileage of a vehicle had declined to 11,621 miles from more than 12,000 from about 1996 to 2006. Think about it: We have better fuel efficiency, and people are driving less. I'm tempted to suggest that more urban youth are riding bicycles around Brooklyn, and workers in general are moving back to cities, while aging baby boomers commute less as they wind down or fully retire.

This piece first appeared in Bloomberg View

Recommended Articles

  • IGM Credit, IGM FX and Rates

    The Context 11.11.19

    11 Nov 2019

    Inside this week’s edition of The Context, Financial Intelligence thought leaders discuss: The Power of Trade Talk Given events towards the end of last week, focus will fall on any details of the Phase 1 trade deal currently under negotiation between the US and China. The moves were sharp in debt markets which suggests any sort of negative news flow will lead to an equally sharp reversal. The NZD Week - Bias is Neutral RBNZ rate cut probability for Nov, i.e. early Wed, is back at 60%. On balance, we think the RBNZ could wait, but suspect the market will stay cautious. Outlook Into Year-end Now Looks More Positive For EMs The Emerging Market carry trade is so far heading for its best quarter in two (and possibly in four if upside persists), and in an environment of still ultra-low global bond yields and with some concerns starting to creep in over equity valuations after a surge in stocks, currency related strategies may find particular favour among investors. Read more from The Context and subscribe to have it delivered to your inbox each week!

    Topics Industry News

  • IGM Credit, IGM FX and Rates

    China Insight: Special Bond Issuance Will be Subdued in Q4

    By Tim Cheung 05 Nov 2019

    Given the lower-than-budgeted fiscal revenue growth so far in 2019 (chart 1), the central government may find it difficult to fulfil its fiscal transfer budgets. As such, local governments could rely more on borrowing to support infrastructure investment. As the total local government bond issuance quota of CNY3.1tn has been fulfilled this year, the total size of extra issuance could be up to CNY2.5tn (including CNY1.3tn in general and CNY1.2tn in special) if necessary. If the government decides to fully utilize the extra special bond issuance quota within the debt ceiling, it could bring CNY2.1tn funds to the government to support infrastructure investment. However, chart 2 shows that special bond issuance has been subdued since it reached its year-high in June. Given the restricted commencement of winter construction, special bond issuance will likely remain subdued in Q4.  

    Topics Industry News

  • IGM Credit, IGM FX and Rates

    The Context 11.04.19

    04 Nov 2019

    Inside this week’s edition of The Context, Financial Intelligence thought leaders discuss: The AUD Week - Bias is Bullish The RBA decision takes centre stage this week, and the Bank is widely forecast to keep rates steady at 0.75%, with a mere 6% chance of a cut currently priced. Evidence of Damage Wrought. Little Central Bankers Can Do South Korean exports continue to plummet (-14.7% y/y in October) indicative of the slowdown in both global trade and in turn economic growth. That the US isn’t insulated from these dynamics was made clear by the Fed chief after the October FOMC. Still, domestic demand continues to bound along at a healthy pace in the US and remains supportive in other jurisdictions… Pinera Gives More Ground to Chilean Protesters, But is CLP Ripe For Bulls? There have been over ten days of riots, protests and strikes in Chile, and after adopting a number of stances (from tough to conciliatory) and failing to quell the unrest with a raft of proposed policy changes, President Pinera has given in to demands and fired eight ministers, including the interior, finance and economy ministers. Read more from The Context and subscribe to have it delivered to your inbox each week!

    Topics Industry News


Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: