skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration
From Money Fund Report®: The announcement this week that Mary Jo White will leave her post as Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission in January wasn’t unexpected, considering the outcome of the presidential election on Nov. 8, sources told Money Fund Report®. Other similar announcements are anticipated in the weeks ahead. The new Trump administration may find, however, that keeping its promises to revise or rescind Obama-era financial regulation may be challenging, and one prominent observer contends that money-market-fund regulation, in particular, is here to stay.

"Money-market-fund regulation is an unusual, and probably atypical example of recent regulation that may be difficult to unwind," explained Robert Plaze, formerly deputy director of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management and currently a partner at law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP. "First, working through the process of money-fund reform was a huge and multiyear undertaking, and almost certainly a painful one." Unlike many other recent regulatory initiatives, he noted, this one didn’t break along typical Republican-Democrat lines. "The two Republican commissioners and the two Democratic commissioners saw the issue differently and voted differently, leaving Chair White to cast the deciding vote." Considering the absence of an ideological split among commissioners, there may be less incentive to reconsider this particular regulation, Plaze said. "Doing so could open a wound that should be allowed to heal."

Two other considerations may argue against any effort to revisit money-fund reform by White’s replacement, the two sitting commissioners who opposed the final rule in 2014, and two commissioners to be confirmed to succeed departed members who voted with White to finalize the latest series of rule changes. "The first is that, in contrast to some other regulatory initiatives that are unfinished, money-market-fund reform is complete and took full effect in October," Plaze observed. "The Eagle has landed, so to speak, and considering the time and resources invested on all sides in complying with the new regulation and the likelihood that a newly-constituted SEC will have a new set of priorities, why would regulators or the fund industry want to go through again what they’ve been through over the past several years?"

The second consideration, Plaze noted, is that the industry isn’t likely to lobby for a change in a provision of money-fund regulation that it had suggested and supported. "It’s likely that in establishing its priorities, a newly-constituted SEC will want to take some signals from the fund industry about initiatives that the Commission under Chair White pursued that were problematical and that it would want to work with the industry in establishing those priorities," Plaze said. Money-market-fund reform was certainly problematical, he acknowledged, but as it turned out, it was less so because of the imposition of a floating NAV on prime funds – something regulators pressed hard for – than because of fees and gates, provisions Plaze observed were suggested and promoted by the industry. "The huge migration of assets from more profitable prime funds to less profitable government funds," which he said has transformed the industry, at least in the short term, "was largely the result of concerns about fees and gates, and therefore it would put the industry in a difficult position to advocate for amending or rescinding a key provision in money-fund regulation that it had supported," Plaze maintained.

About suggestions that, short of substantial reform, an industry-friendly SEC could moderate some provisions of money-fund reform, such as allowing some prime institutional funds to return to constant-net-asset valuation and operate without gates and fees, Plaze was circumspect. "It might be possible, but that suggestion and others like it exist now in a world of ideas where virtually everyone will suggest things that should be done – or undone." What we’re facing in the months ahead, he stressed, "is a world of pragmatic ‘regulatory reset’ in which a new SEC chair and new SEC commissioners will establish a list of priorities and get things in place to achieve them." Money-market reform, he noted, isn’t likely to be high on that list.

"With the election only a week or so behind us, there are more questions than answers about the future course of financial reform," Plaze concluded. "However, it’s good to ask the questions as we speculate about where we go from here. The important consideration is that it would be hard to unscramble the eggs of money-fund reform so soon after it took effect, and regulators may have other pressing issues on their plate."

Recommended Articles

  • EPFR - fund flow & allocations data

    Quants Corner - Finding value in negative flows

    By Sayad Baronyan 01 Dec 2020

    Despite the strong rebound seen during November, this year has been a tough year – in flow terms – for both Emerging and Developed Markets Equity Funds. With one month of 2020 to go, net redemptions from all EM Equity Funds totalled $32 billion, while DM Equity Funds have seen $171 billion flow out. The net figure for DM Equity Funds would now be positive if a net $223 billion had not been pulled out of US Equity Funds. Although this group has been experiencing structural outflows for some time as retiring Baby Boomers rotate to less volatile asset classes, the sheer volume of the outflows is surprising given the performance of US equity markets...

    Topics Industry News

  • IGM FX and Rates

    FX Viewpoint – Seasonality in December?

    By Tony Nyman 01 Dec 2020

    In our Q4 version of Oct 5, we concluded that 15-20 years ago, it was a good bet to short the DOLLAR. More recently, we have seen strength. We continued Q4 seasonality this year could come second to the potentially big drivers of COVID vaccine hopes, a resilient global economy, the Biden lead and Brexit, but BEARS might want to look at a LONG AUD/USD (but of course the RBA could well cut rates before the year is out). The last 20 years has seen an ave of +0.9% during Q4 and current standing is +2.5%. We added USD BULLS might consider a LONG USD/NOK. An ave win of +1.4% since 2000. A very short NOK market though has rocketed in this risk-on environment and the less said about the -5.0% USD/NOK losses the better! So far in the month's early exchanges, the USD is mostly slightly lower, from -0.03% AUD through to -0.3% CHF and EUR and -0.4% SEK. Only USD win so far is the tiny +0.1% YEN. How does the big DOLLAR tend to fare generally in the run-up to year-end? Further, are there any G10s that seem to perform particularly well/badly through Dec? For more read our FX Viewpoint Blog >

    Topics Industry News

  • IGM FX and Rates

    Viewpoint: RBI intervention here to stay but INR FX may do better in Q1 2021

    By Jonathan Cavenagh 30 Nov 2020

    - INR's underperformance in 2020 has been quite stark given the supportive balance of payments backdrop for the currency. The current account balance has shifted into surplus for the first time since 2004 and net FDI inflows have more than offset net portfolio outflows. INR FX is also cheap relative to our short term fair value model and has not caught up with the improved risk back drop reflected in higher equities. - This large divergence mainly reflects the RBI's continued aggressive FX intervention, which has seen FX reserves for the central bank rise sharply and offset the balance of payments surplus. - In this piece we outline the medium term drivers of RBI's FX intervention, which we feel are mainly geared around currency competitiveness. India inflation is generally higher than its trading partners, which means nominal FX appreciation needs to be contained to offset this trend, while India's share of global goods exports has stagnated in recent years. The country also has structural trade deficits with big manufacturing economy's like China. - We conclude that RBI FX intervention will remain a key feature of the INR FX landscape. - Still, there is a scope for the intervention pace to moderate from heady levels into 2021. Historically, stronger wholesale inflation pressures sees the pace of intervention slow as the authorities become more comfortable with some FX strength to offset imported inflation pressures. A continued recovery in global commodity prices suggests the risks for India's wholesale inflation outlook are skewed to the upside. - FX intervention also tends to come down when export and IP growth trends improve, which is also a risk as we move into early 2021. Coupled with the fact that Q1 tends to be the best quarter for INR FX from a seasonal stand point, suggests to us the market will use USD/INR spikes between now and year end as dollar selling opportunities. See the full note below for more details. Read on for more...

    Topics Industry News


Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: