skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

I am first, foremost and solely a US Interest Rate Strategist (call me I-rate for short) so it is with no shortage of anxiety that I dare delve into the equity market.  Caveat emptor; I’m typically bullish on bonds and bearish on stocks so what follows panders to a career bias.  That said, I do look at the evidence and there are things out there that make me wary of equity valuations which, all things being equal, should serve as a brake of sorts on a sharp rise in bond yields.

The equity gurus cite various broad perspectives like P/E ratios on the S&P 500, and those trailing and those forward looking, and variations on that theme.  I’ll follow their lead.  I like to look at the offbeat, not the least because that might raise fewer challenges to my analysis.  In the spirit of looking at the equity market, and by proxy the financial health of corporate America, I looked at the actual cost of a share of the S&P 500 in terms of what it would take an ‘average’ American to buy it.

Using Average Hourly Earnings, one would have to work 108.3 hours to buy a share of the S&P 500.  This is only slightly above the peak of March 2000 (107.8 hours) and well above the peak prior to the last recession of 89.8 hours.  A market technician looking at a chart of this might caution a double top – a reversal pattern.  So at least by this simple measure, it’s fair to argue that stocks cost a lot of money to the average American which is probably one of the reasons that many Americans don’t actually own stocks.  A recent Gallup Poll puts the figure at 52%; the lowest level in Gallup’s 19-year trend.

 

The big buyers, of course, have been the companies themselves.  The Fed’s Flow of Funds data shows that net equity issuance for the first three quarters of last year was $1.295 trillion following on $1.32 trillion for all four quarters of 2015.  (Net Equity Issuance is simply the change in the net dollar amount of shares outstanding.  A negative figure means that either the shares were bought in buybacks or through M&A action.)  That’s an awful lot of working hours if you think about it.  There is a flipside to this that I’ll get to in a moment.

 

 

Although I said there were better people than me to discuss P/E ratios, I’ll do it anyway.  S&P puts it at 25.9 for the S&P 500, which is the highest it’s been since 2010, and with the spikey exception of the extraordinary days that followed the financial crisis, the ratio was last at that level back in 2004.  So, again, rather high.

 

 

Another way of looking at this is the CAPE Shiller P/E which is the price (the P part) divided by the moving average 10 years of earnings (the E part) adjusted for inflation thus giving it a longer time-frame. That stands at 28.2, just over the peak it reached from 2003-7. That said, it bounced up to that level with only minor pullbacks for those four years.

 

 

Another cause for my concern is the caution that market shows in volatility measures.  With valuations arguably extended and, hmm (careful here) a degree of discomforting spontaneity stemming from the White House, why is the VIX so low?  (The VIX is an index put out by the CBOE that measures the implied volatility of S&P 500 options, also known as the “fear index”.)  At 10.6 it is basically at its post-crisis lows.

 

 

A related index is the CBOE’s SKEW that measures tail risk based on out-of-the-money options.  On January 20 it boasted a move to its second highest level ever but has subsequently come off.  Am I the only one anxious?

 

I earlier mentioned a flipside to negative net equity issuance which is that the buybacks have come at the expense of massive corporate borrowing, a subject my colleagues at Informa Global Markets follow intensely.  To wit, there’s been an explosion of corporate issuance which in turn should create at least some concern with the overall size of corporate indebtedness.

 

 

Outstanding corporate debt as a percent of GDP is 45.2%.  That’s the second highest in history, marginally surpassed at 45.6% in Q1 2009 and almost touched in Q4 2001.  Those dates ring any bells?  They were the height of the last two recessions.  And that’s especially notable because the excuse for such a high percentage during a recession comes on the back of weaker, negative, GDP.  The current level comes with GDP growth and so is a function of the increase in issuance.

 

Do I need to mention that this borrowing has been for buybacks etc. but not for the sort of investment that enhances productivity or expands the economy?  The most recent FOMC statement, which was otherwise somewhat optimistic, noted “business fixed investment has remained soft.”  This is rather late in the business cycle to see such a comment.

 

 

Related to that are corporate interest payments. Non-financial corporate interest payments are 2.75% of GDP (1.9% on a net basis).   The net payments are near a peak and the overall is remarkably high considering how much corporate yields have come down.  You’d think the payments would have followed rates more closely.  That they haven’t raises the question of how much those payments rise when interest rates lift further and/or when spreads widen out.  The easy call is that new issuance should decline but in the event spreads widen due to a profit slowdown or recession the high level of corporate indebtedness will exacerbate such widening.

 

 

 

David Ader is Chief Macro Strategist for Informa Financial Intelligence. For further information, please see: https://financialintelligence.informa.com/

Recommended Articles

  • EPFR - fund flow & allocations data

    Inflation muscling in on post-pandemic narrative

    By Cameron Brandt 18 Jan 2021

    For several months now, investors have been buying into forecasts of a global economic rebound unleashed by widespread vaccination against the COVID-19 virus. Fears that inflation will also slip the leash when the rebound occurs took a backseat to the global reflation story. During the second week of January, this undercurrent of inflationary angst bubbled to the surface as markets factored in rising commodity and transportation costs, cash stockpiles in savings and money market accounts, the fiscal agenda of the incoming US administration and signals from the US Federal Reserve that the switch to a tightening bias could occur much sooner than previously expected. The week ending Jan. 13 saw EPFR-tracked Inflation Protected Bond Funds extend their current inflow streak to eight weeks and $8.7 billion, Bank Loan Funds record their biggest inflow since mid-2Q18, flows into Commodities Sector Funds hit a record high and Energy Sector Funds record their 12th consecutive inflow and largest in over 11 months.

    Topics Industry News

  • EPFR - fund flow & allocations data

    Quants Corner - Animal spirits arise in retail investors

    By Vikram Srimurthy 13 Jan 2021

    After years of pulling money out of equity funds, retail investors are starting to step back in. EPFR-tracked Equity Funds ended 2020 with eight straight weeks of retail inflows, their longest such run since 2Q06. In this, retail investors are several years behind the institutional money and, as a result, have missed out on strong market returns four of the past five years. Global Equity Funds have been the biggest beneficiaries of this latest surge in retail interest. During 2019 this group recorded retail inflows 19 of the year’s 52 weeks. In 2020 they posted retail inflows 44 times. The last time there was such a concentration of retail money going into a single fund category was 2016, and before that 2015. In both cases, the rush into Australia and China Equity Funds ended badly for retail investors. Are Global Funds headed for the same comeuppance? Have they missed the bus? Prior to 2020, the chance of a positive retail flow into Equity Funds ranged from one week in every nine during 2014 to one in 25 during 2016. Last year this group attracted retail money two out of every five weeks...

    Topics Industry News

  • Zephyr Portfolio Analytics

    Ryan Nauman's Weekly Recap: COVID-19 Market Edition 01.11.21

    By Ryan Nauman 12 Jan 2021

    The week ahead will be highlighted by the release of the December consumer price index. Inflation is in the crosshairs of investors as Inflation expectations have been increasing, particularly this week as investors are anticipating additional fiscal stimulus following the Georgia election. Additionally, large financial corporations kick off the fourth quarter earnings cycle during the week. Corporate earnings are expected to increase during the quarter. However, coronavirus cases surged during the quarter which may place downward pressure on earnings...

    Topics Industry News

;

Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: