skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

I am first, foremost and solely a US Interest Rate Strategist (call me I-rate for short) so it is with no shortage of anxiety that I dare delve into the equity market.  Caveat emptor; I’m typically bullish on bonds and bearish on stocks so what follows panders to a career bias.  That said, I do look at the evidence and there are things out there that make me wary of equity valuations which, all things being equal, should serve as a brake of sorts on a sharp rise in bond yields.

The equity gurus cite various broad perspectives like P/E ratios on the S&P 500, and those trailing and those forward looking, and variations on that theme.  I’ll follow their lead.  I like to look at the offbeat, not the least because that might raise fewer challenges to my analysis.  In the spirit of looking at the equity market, and by proxy the financial health of corporate America, I looked at the actual cost of a share of the S&P 500 in terms of what it would take an ‘average’ American to buy it.

Using Average Hourly Earnings, one would have to work 108.3 hours to buy a share of the S&P 500.  This is only slightly above the peak of March 2000 (107.8 hours) and well above the peak prior to the last recession of 89.8 hours.  A market technician looking at a chart of this might caution a double top – a reversal pattern.  So at least by this simple measure, it’s fair to argue that stocks cost a lot of money to the average American which is probably one of the reasons that many Americans don’t actually own stocks.  A recent Gallup Poll puts the figure at 52%; the lowest level in Gallup’s 19-year trend.

 

The big buyers, of course, have been the companies themselves.  The Fed’s Flow of Funds data shows that net equity issuance for the first three quarters of last year was $1.295 trillion following on $1.32 trillion for all four quarters of 2015.  (Net Equity Issuance is simply the change in the net dollar amount of shares outstanding.  A negative figure means that either the shares were bought in buybacks or through M&A action.)  That’s an awful lot of working hours if you think about it.  There is a flipside to this that I’ll get to in a moment.

 

 

Although I said there were better people than me to discuss P/E ratios, I’ll do it anyway.  S&P puts it at 25.9 for the S&P 500, which is the highest it’s been since 2010, and with the spikey exception of the extraordinary days that followed the financial crisis, the ratio was last at that level back in 2004.  So, again, rather high.

 

 

Another way of looking at this is the CAPE Shiller P/E which is the price (the P part) divided by the moving average 10 years of earnings (the E part) adjusted for inflation thus giving it a longer time-frame. That stands at 28.2, just over the peak it reached from 2003-7. That said, it bounced up to that level with only minor pullbacks for those four years.

 

 

Another cause for my concern is the caution that market shows in volatility measures.  With valuations arguably extended and, hmm (careful here) a degree of discomforting spontaneity stemming from the White House, why is the VIX so low?  (The VIX is an index put out by the CBOE that measures the implied volatility of S&P 500 options, also known as the “fear index”.)  At 10.6 it is basically at its post-crisis lows.

 

 

A related index is the CBOE’s SKEW that measures tail risk based on out-of-the-money options.  On January 20 it boasted a move to its second highest level ever but has subsequently come off.  Am I the only one anxious?

 

I earlier mentioned a flipside to negative net equity issuance which is that the buybacks have come at the expense of massive corporate borrowing, a subject my colleagues at Informa Global Markets follow intensely.  To wit, there’s been an explosion of corporate issuance which in turn should create at least some concern with the overall size of corporate indebtedness.

 

 

Outstanding corporate debt as a percent of GDP is 45.2%.  That’s the second highest in history, marginally surpassed at 45.6% in Q1 2009 and almost touched in Q4 2001.  Those dates ring any bells?  They were the height of the last two recessions.  And that’s especially notable because the excuse for such a high percentage during a recession comes on the back of weaker, negative, GDP.  The current level comes with GDP growth and so is a function of the increase in issuance.

 

Do I need to mention that this borrowing has been for buybacks etc. but not for the sort of investment that enhances productivity or expands the economy?  The most recent FOMC statement, which was otherwise somewhat optimistic, noted “business fixed investment has remained soft.”  This is rather late in the business cycle to see such a comment.

 

 

Related to that are corporate interest payments. Non-financial corporate interest payments are 2.75% of GDP (1.9% on a net basis).   The net payments are near a peak and the overall is remarkably high considering how much corporate yields have come down.  You’d think the payments would have followed rates more closely.  That they haven’t raises the question of how much those payments rise when interest rates lift further and/or when spreads widen out.  The easy call is that new issuance should decline but in the event spreads widen due to a profit slowdown or recession the high level of corporate indebtedness will exacerbate such widening.

 

 

 

David Ader is Chief Macro Strategist for Informa Financial Intelligence. For further information, please see: https://financialintelligence.informa.com/

Recommended Articles

  • IGM Credit

    Global ESG Issuance Trends 1H 2021 Edition

    By Michelle Kwek 19 Jul 2021

    • Global issuance of ESG bonds tracked by IGM in the first half of 2021 surpassed all of 2020's issuance to total USD 474.79bn on 595 tranches. This compared to last year's ESG issuance of USD 468bn on 530 tranches. • Q2 ESG issuance came in a touch lower than Q1's record quarter issuance of USD 251.67bn at USD 223.11bn but still represented the 2nd largest quarter of ESG issuance per IGM's records and 97% higher than Q2 2020. • Green bonds remain the favored theme and comprised 44% of total ESG issuance over Q2 at USD 98bn versus 40% in Q2. • Sustainability-Linked bond issuance stood out in Q2 however with issuance surging to a record USD 26.28bn, more than the accumulated volume from when the 1st SLB was issued in Sep 2019 to end Q1 2021, of USD 15.789bn. • The 10 largest tranches in Q2 (and H1) once again came from Europe or cross border* issuers, of which the largest ESG issuer continues to be the EU via its SURE Social Bond framework. Consequently Euros, SSAs and Investment Grade proved once again to be the predominant currency, sector and rating categories of ESG issuances. • ESG now comprises around a quarter of all European issuance, led by green & social bonds. • Q2 ESG issuance by US issuers was the 2nd largest on record after Q1's record volume of USD57.74bn at USD 51.55bn and represents a 34% rise vs Q2 2020. Issuance in the US has gained four fold from Q2 2020 but still represents a mere 8% of US issuance volumes, signalling room for expansion. • China has leapt onto the ESG bandwagon and now represents the 4th largest global issuer ex supras after France, Germany and the US, with issuance from Chinese issuers surging 91% in Q2 vs. Q1 to USD 7.97bn and USD 11.47bn for 1H. From 2% this time last year, APAC US$ ESG issuance now comprises over 16% of all APAC US$ issuance.

    Topics Industry News ESG

  • EPFR - fund flow & allocations data

    Investors navigate multiple currents

    By Cameron Brandt 16 Jul 2021

    In a year of multiple – and often competing – economic narratives and themes, the second week of July offered something for everyone. For the reflationary bulls, key equity indexes on both sides of the Atlantic hit fresh record highs as new US childcare tax credits started flowing, the Chinese government cut reserve requirements for domestic banks and the 2Q21 US corporate earnings season got off to a strong start. For inflation hawks, core US inflation in June hit its highest level since 1991. For those betting on a greener future, the European Union unveiled a sweeping plan, Fit for 55, that aims to eliminate petrol-driven vehicles and expand the use of carbon taxes. For those who believe that the Covid-19 pandemic remains the biggest story, infection rates driven by the Delta variant continued to climb. Against this backdrop, flows to EPFR-tracked funds followed the stimulus trail while steering clear of groups where monetary tightening or the ongoing pandemic could have a bigger impact. China Equity Funds posted their first inflow since the second week of June and biggest since the second week of May, Infrastructure Sector Funds extended their longest inflow streak since 2014 and Europe Bond Funds enjoyed record-setting inflows during a week when the European Central Bank announced a new inflation targeting policy. Overall, the week ending July 14 saw all Equity Funds post a collective net inflow of $18.7 billion versus $362 million for Alternative Funds, $2.5 billion for Balanced Funds, $5.6 billion for Bond Funds and an outflow of $30 billion for Money Market Funds.

    Topics Industry News

;

Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: