skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

I am first, foremost and solely a US Interest Rate Strategist (call me I-rate for short) so it is with no shortage of anxiety that I dare delve into the equity market.  Caveat emptor; I’m typically bullish on bonds and bearish on stocks so what follows panders to a career bias.  That said, I do look at the evidence and there are things out there that make me wary of equity valuations which, all things being equal, should serve as a brake of sorts on a sharp rise in bond yields.

The equity gurus cite various broad perspectives like P/E ratios on the S&P 500, and those trailing and those forward looking, and variations on that theme.  I’ll follow their lead.  I like to look at the offbeat, not the least because that might raise fewer challenges to my analysis.  In the spirit of looking at the equity market, and by proxy the financial health of corporate America, I looked at the actual cost of a share of the S&P 500 in terms of what it would take an ‘average’ American to buy it.

Using Average Hourly Earnings, one would have to work 108.3 hours to buy a share of the S&P 500.  This is only slightly above the peak of March 2000 (107.8 hours) and well above the peak prior to the last recession of 89.8 hours.  A market technician looking at a chart of this might caution a double top – a reversal pattern.  So at least by this simple measure, it’s fair to argue that stocks cost a lot of money to the average American which is probably one of the reasons that many Americans don’t actually own stocks.  A recent Gallup Poll puts the figure at 52%; the lowest level in Gallup’s 19-year trend.

 

The big buyers, of course, have been the companies themselves.  The Fed’s Flow of Funds data shows that net equity issuance for the first three quarters of last year was $1.295 trillion following on $1.32 trillion for all four quarters of 2015.  (Net Equity Issuance is simply the change in the net dollar amount of shares outstanding.  A negative figure means that either the shares were bought in buybacks or through M&A action.)  That’s an awful lot of working hours if you think about it.  There is a flipside to this that I’ll get to in a moment.

 

 

Although I said there were better people than me to discuss P/E ratios, I’ll do it anyway.  S&P puts it at 25.9 for the S&P 500, which is the highest it’s been since 2010, and with the spikey exception of the extraordinary days that followed the financial crisis, the ratio was last at that level back in 2004.  So, again, rather high.

 

 

Another way of looking at this is the CAPE Shiller P/E which is the price (the P part) divided by the moving average 10 years of earnings (the E part) adjusted for inflation thus giving it a longer time-frame. That stands at 28.2, just over the peak it reached from 2003-7. That said, it bounced up to that level with only minor pullbacks for those four years.

 

 

Another cause for my concern is the caution that market shows in volatility measures.  With valuations arguably extended and, hmm (careful here) a degree of discomforting spontaneity stemming from the White House, why is the VIX so low?  (The VIX is an index put out by the CBOE that measures the implied volatility of S&P 500 options, also known as the “fear index”.)  At 10.6 it is basically at its post-crisis lows.

 

 

A related index is the CBOE’s SKEW that measures tail risk based on out-of-the-money options.  On January 20 it boasted a move to its second highest level ever but has subsequently come off.  Am I the only one anxious?

 

I earlier mentioned a flipside to negative net equity issuance which is that the buybacks have come at the expense of massive corporate borrowing, a subject my colleagues at Informa Global Markets follow intensely.  To wit, there’s been an explosion of corporate issuance which in turn should create at least some concern with the overall size of corporate indebtedness.

 

 

Outstanding corporate debt as a percent of GDP is 45.2%.  That’s the second highest in history, marginally surpassed at 45.6% in Q1 2009 and almost touched in Q4 2001.  Those dates ring any bells?  They were the height of the last two recessions.  And that’s especially notable because the excuse for such a high percentage during a recession comes on the back of weaker, negative, GDP.  The current level comes with GDP growth and so is a function of the increase in issuance.

 

Do I need to mention that this borrowing has been for buybacks etc. but not for the sort of investment that enhances productivity or expands the economy?  The most recent FOMC statement, which was otherwise somewhat optimistic, noted “business fixed investment has remained soft.”  This is rather late in the business cycle to see such a comment.

 

 

Related to that are corporate interest payments. Non-financial corporate interest payments are 2.75% of GDP (1.9% on a net basis).   The net payments are near a peak and the overall is remarkably high considering how much corporate yields have come down.  You’d think the payments would have followed rates more closely.  That they haven’t raises the question of how much those payments rise when interest rates lift further and/or when spreads widen out.  The easy call is that new issuance should decline but in the event spreads widen due to a profit slowdown or recession the high level of corporate indebtedness will exacerbate such widening.

 

 

 

David Ader is Chief Macro Strategist for Informa Financial Intelligence. For further information, please see: https://financialintelligence.informa.com/

Recommended Articles

  • Zephyr Portfolio Analytics

    Ryan Nauman's Weekly Recap: COVID-19 Market Edition 04.12.21

    By Ryan Nauman 12 Apr 2021

    The week ahead will be a busy week for economic data, but it also marks the beginning of the Q1 corporate earnings season. Inflation has been a highly anticipated economic data release during the past few months, and it will be again during the week ahead. Despite the growing angst and rising prices in pockets of the the economy, like producer prices, headline inflation has remained muted. We will see if some of the higher prices in segments of the economy start to trickle through to the broader headline inflation number when the CPI is released. Q1 earnings season kicks off with blue chip financials reporting during the week ahead. Investor enthusiasm and expectations are high, so it will be important for companies to release solid earnings and forward guidance...

    Topics Industry News

  • EPFR - fund flow & allocations data

    Focus on liquidity and yield in early 2Q21

    By Cameron Brandt 12 Apr 2021

    During the first week of April benchmark US equity indexes climbed to new record highs, the IMF forecast full year growth of 6.4% for the world’s largest economy -- which added over 900,000 jobs in March – and US Federal Reserve officials reiterated their commitment to highly accommodative monetary policy. Against this backdrop, mutual fund investors headed in opposite directions. EPFR-tracked US Money Market Funds took in fresh money for the eighth time in the past nine weeks, a run that has seen these liquidity vehicles pull in over $170 billion, while flows to Emerging Markets and High Yield Bond Funds during the first week of the second quarter hit eight and 41-week highs respectively. Investors not stretching for yield or going liquid stuck with established reflationary and inflationary themes or looked to cut costs. Through the week ending April 7, Equity Funds with global mandates have posted inflows every week year-to-date, as have equity and bond funds with socially responsible (SRI) or environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates. Meanwhile Inflation Protected Bond Funds have absorbed fresh money for 21 straight weeks and Bank Loan Funds, traditionally used to play rising short-term interest rates, for 14 consecutive weeks. On the cost cutting front, there has been growing interest in Collective Investment Trusts (CITs). Like ETFs and mutual funds, CITs are pooled investment vehicles, but are not regulated by the SEC and have cost structures akin to separately managed accounts. EPFR’s coverage of CIT assets has grown fourfold over the past three years to over $850 billion, and in % of AUM terms these vehicles have been more popular with investors than ETFs or mutual funds.

    Topics Industry News

  • IGM Credit

    IGM Global Credit Snapshot

    By David Corbell 08 Apr 2021

    IGM Global Credit Snapshot | Wednesday, 8th April 2021 - Global issuance volumes picked up pace over March, with Q1 volumes strong - European and US high yield markets chalked up record first quarters. - Concerns over rising inflation and in turn higher US Treasury yields continue to entice issuers to fund sooner than later - However, IGM's sentiment metrics, which largely saw average NICs track higher, does suggest some selective investor resistance. - For specific regional highlights see below.

    Topics Industry News

;

Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: