skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

There is in the world of journalism something called a second day lead in which you report on a story that's already happened or you missed the scoop and try to come up with another angle to stave off embarrassment. This commentary likely falls into the latter category.

I was following up on some of the details of the Q4 GDP report whose initial release came out at the very end of January and saw some things in it that on the surface were impressive but whose sub-components revealed a more disturbing if ongoing thematic. Specifically, that there's painfully little investment going on.

At first glance that might not be too clear from the latest GDP report. In Q4, Gross Private Domestic Investment contributed 1.67% to the 1.9% overall GDP gain, its highest annualized rate contribution since Q2 2014 and 4th best quarter since Q4 2013. Bear in mind the mean from 1991-2000 was 1.28%. Could this be a hopeful sign after a merely 0.86% contribution since 2010? Are businesses finally investing for growth and productivity?

Well, not so much. When breaking down that broad figure - Gross Private Domestic Investment - we find that 1) the gain comes off an average for the prior four quarters of -0.45%, and 2) 1%, the single biggest contributor to this category, of that 1.67% came from a buildup in inventories, not always a good thing if inventory building in a given quarter means less in the following quarter.

I'll delve down deeper still. Investment in equipment, which is the real mark of businesses investing for organic growth (and not just the sort of organics grown in Colorado) rose just 0.18% and that off the four prior negative quarters. Again, I emphasize that investment in equipment (which includes software) is the substance of enhanced productivity and it's simply not showing up.

Overall Nonresidential Investment rose 0.3%, also a relatively substantial gain compared to the last couple of years but disappointing by historic standards. Intellectual Property was 0.26% of that. As the folks at The Liscio Report remind us while Intellectual Property can enhance productivity it's often just a form of 'rent seeking' behavior.

Why is this so important? Because a lack of investment means a reduced potential for productivity gains. What's essential to GDP growth is a rising population (in 2016 the US population grew at the slowest pace since the Great Depression) and productivity gains which should translate to wage gains. We're not seeing either. For context 'trend' growth was 2.40% from 1990-2010 but since 2010 has slipped to 0.74%.

What's disturbing about the lack of business investment is that it suggests that corporates don't have confidence enough to make this sort of investment. I've been on about how corporate America has had no inhibition about raising capital to facilitate buybacks. That's fine for shareholder value but it doesn't enhance productivity. The latest GDP report shouldn't improve anyone's confidence in that matter.

David Ader is Chief Macro Strategist for Informa Financial Intelligence. For further information on our products and services, please see:

Recommended Articles


Any questions? Speak to a specialist

Would you like to request sample data or analysis from Informa Financial Intelligence? 

See how our tailored solutions can help you gain a competitive advantage: